Our Galaxy is atypically positioned in the cosmos

The overall grand structure of the universe is that galaxies are scattered along filaments surrounding voids as illustrated in the simulation below:

aHR0cDovL3d3dy5saXZlc2NpZW5jZS5jb20vaW1hZ2VzL2kvMDAwLzA5My8wMTcvb3JpZ2luYWwvQ29zbWljLXZvaWQtMS5qcGc=
The large-scale structure of the universe.     Credit: Millennium Simulation Project

Two studies, one from 2013 and one from 2017, now confirm that not only is our own galaxy,  the Milky Way, located atypically in a void rather than a filament, but also that it is located in the largest known void – about 7 times larger than an average void.

The original study came to this conclusion on the basis of galaxy catalogues, whereas the new study measures the motions of galaxies by measuring changes to the energy of Cosmic Background Radiation which has passed through those galaxies. The motions of galaxy clusters indicates those regions of higher gravitational attraction. The two studies, by different means, are consistent.

This, statistically, is a very surprising result. It might suggest that there is something wrong with the underlying theory behind astrophysical measurements, it might be a statistical fluke, or there might be an, as yet, unthought-of explanation.

Live Science article

Advertisements

Universe Expansion rate – measurements conflict

There are two basic approaches to measuring the rate of expansion of the universe:

a) using Cepheid variable stars – their brightness tells us how far away they are, and their redshift facilitates calculating the expansion rate

b) deductions from ripples in the CMB (Cosmic Microwave Background) – originating from the big-bang

These two methods have become more refined over time, but their measured values are some way apart – “about four times the size of their combined uncertainty.” This is according to research published in the Astrophysics Journal, July 12th.

The simplest explanation would be that the expansion rate is greater in the nearby universe than the more distant universe – but such a conclusion is incompatible with the current model, and would require new physics. Research is ongoing.

Space.com article

Update: 8th February 2019: A new technique has been described for measuring the rate of expansion of the Universe (the Hubble constant). Observing the duplicate images of quasars that show when an intervening galaxy acts as a gravitational lens, astronomers can use the slight differences in light path for the images, (which are revealed by the slight difference in arrival-time of brightness variations), to measure the distances to the lens-galaxy and quasar. Combining this with the red-shift gives a measurement of the Hubble Constant – in this case 72.5. This agrees with the Cepheid variable measurements ((a) above) but is 8% higher than measurements form the ancient universe i.e. the CMB measurements. This goes some way to confirming that the rate of expansion is increasing, but does not provide any explanation why.

Live Science article